Primum non nocere

by Hande Oktay Tureli

As physicians, we probably all have an almost innate fear of making matters worse while trying to help our patients. The maxim of “first, do no harm” is invoked when considering an intervention that carries a risk of harm but a less certain chance of benefit. For a sizeable part of the medical community, transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are such risky interventions.

One of the main arguments against closure is that the intervention carries procedural and long-term risks. Clinically apparent or silent peri-interventional cerebral embolism is one such risk and in this study we investigated its incidence with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) and plasma neuron specific enolase (NSE) levels.

All our PFO patients were under medical therapy with aspirin at the time of recurrent cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack; percutaneous device closure procedures were in accordance with the guidelines (Class IIb; level of evidence, C), but one still fears inducing cerebral emboli while trying to fix the cause of stroke.

We did not detect clinically apparent cerebral emboli in any patient; however, silent embolic events may also cause deficits having more subtle manifestations not assessable by simple neurological examinations. With  DW-MRI, one new microembolic lesion was found in only 1 of 30 patients; this incidence was much lower than we initially expected.

Given the rather small number of patients; only one brand of closure devices was used in order to increase the statistical power of the study. We used the newest commercially available nitinol meshwire occluder devices at the time of the study. I think any device’s safety must be addressed with many studies and DW-MRI appears to be the most reliable tool for detecting cerebral embolic complications in follow-up of patients undergoing potentially high-risk angiographic procedures. On the other hand, NSE levels after the procedure were found to be not correlated with presence of DW-MRI lesion and intervention times.

This study is not a superiority trial of medical therapy versus device closure; there are multiple ongoing and published trials comparing treatment alternatives. Long-term observations are needed to determine if the mentioned silent ischemic events culminate in any form of clinically apparent cerebral dysfunction.

Oktay Tureli H, Ungan I, Tureli D, Demir B, Pirhan O, Bayrak HI, Caglar IM, Karakaya O, Inci E. Risk of Cerebral Embolism After Interventional Closure of Symptomatic Patent Foramen Ovale or Atrial Septal Defect: A Diffusion-Weighted MRI and Neuron-Specific Enolase-Based Study. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013;25(10):519-524.

Selected Related Articles:

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s